Geoengineering refers to the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight, increasing precipitation, or removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Proponents argue that geoengineering could provide innovative solutions to global warming. Opponents argue that it is risky, unproven, and could have unforeseen negative consequences.
69% Yes |
31% No |
69% Yes |
31% No |
See how support for each position on “Geoengineering” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Geoengineering” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9L4Z23B 7 days7D
Yes, the Department of Interior should engage in P3's to research geoengineering and other ways to combat climate change
@9MJTP4G2wks2W
Yes, but with caution and careful consideration of potential risks and benefits.
@RobinHoude 6 days6D
Yes, but only with international cooperation since unintended effects would not be limited to national borders
@9MS62CQ1wk1W
How about put a bigger focus on sef sufficiency & sustainability and less on convenience instead of trying to manipulating the world to fit us?
@9MRSJBQ1wk1W
Yes, but it should be used as a supplement to alternative solutions that target the root of the problem instead of a replacement
@9MQ3BJM1wk1W
Yes, at this point some level of geoengineering may be necessary to combat climate change and remediate the damage done so far.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
