Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.
24% Yes |
76% No |
24% Yes |
76% No |
See how support for each position on “Electric Vehicle Mandates” has changed over time for 330 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Electric Vehicle Mandates” has changed over time for 330 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9N336P85 days5D
provide incentives to make electric/hybrid cars cheaper
@9MZFB3Z5 days5D
No, it's an unrealistic expectation that will never be met and will only lead to a lack of creative innovation
@9MYQ4756 days6D
No, the government should subsidize walkable infrastructure and public transportation instead
@9MYMGYN6 days6D
Yes, but only if new EV car prices come down to be affordable to middle income buyers,(under $75K income) even if it requires subsidies on a sliding scale to do so.
@9MYFGYR6 days6D
Yes, but make sure charging stations are widely available.
@9MXB2TJ7 days7D
No, electric cars are not feasible in large parts of the county. Hybrid technology makes much more sense.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
